Facebook.com overtakes Google.com as most visited USA domain.

In a press release from HitWise published on CNN Money a few minutes ago, Facebook.com just overtook Google.com as the most visited domain in the USA. This is possibly the most significant milestone in Facebook’s history as a large company. Here’s why:

Most of Google’s revenue comes from their Ad business. Half of it comes from their own properties and the other half from a distributed network of sites. (sounding familiar already I’m sure).

There is a lot of noise around Google’s other apps and experiments, but from a business perspective that’s all it is. Noise. Google is a cash creation machine and the cash is created by the ad network both on and off-site. To give you some perspective, Gmail ranks a distant third among email providers with 37 million uniques vs Yahoo Mail’s 106 million uniques 5 months ago [Comsore].

So Google’s business is relatively simple. It’s a the best search engine in the world and an ad network with themselves as their own biggest customer.

Google built this business by first creating an incredibly hot property that gave it’s users an incentive to provide it with awesome targeting data. Then it built an ad network around the targeting data.

The hardest part about building Google was to create the hot property (the search engine) that incentivises users to keep coming back and feeding it more targeting data. The next part of creating Google was a little easier because if they screwed it up the first time they get to try and try again until they succeed in building a money printing machine on the back of this hot-property-with-targeting-data that really does print money.

Facebook have the hot property that keeps users coming back and feeding it targeting data. They really screwed up the Ad network the first time they had a crack at it with Beacon. But, predictably, their users forgave them and they’ll keep having another crack at it until their money printing machine is running at optimum efficiency.

There are a few reasons I believe Facebook may be a bigger success than Google long term:

  1. They have better data in the form of individual demographics, interests and data inferred from the social graph.
  2. They already have a distributed network of sites in the form of Facebook Connect which has deeper integration than AdSense. That means Facebook gets more data about visitors to those sites than Google AdSense.

Possible risks:

  1. Their management team doesn’t have Eric Schmidt. Eric spent years getting schooled by Microsoft when he ran Novell. So he has the hunger, the scar-tissue and battlefield awareness that you need to compete with juggernauts.
  2. The hasbeen factor. Facebook has had a surprisingly good run and has proven to me it has legs because I’m still going back after a few years. But lets see if they can maintain that over the next decade.

13 thoughts on “Facebook.com overtakes Google.com as most visited USA domain.

  1. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.
    I will be sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back sometime
    soon. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great posts, have
    a nice day!

  2. Having ead this I though it was very informative. I appreciate yoou spending soome time and energy to put this content
    together. I once again find myselff spending a significant amount of time bothh
    reading and posting comments. But soo what, it wwas still worthwhile!

  3. Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this
    site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of
    times it’s difficult to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and
    visual appeal. I must say that you’ve done a fantastic job with this.
    Additionally, the blog loads super quick for me on Firefox.
    Superb Blog!

  4. Pingback: Farmville Multiple chicken coops barn raising | Farmville Cheats Guide

  5. Maybe I’m simply underestimating Facebook Connect, but to me it seems that FB’s goal is get you to stay on their site as long as possible, whereas Google needs to get you off their site as quickly as possible.

    That makes me think that Facebook will never be able to push their ads as hard as Google does. There are some searches these days where all the organic results fall below the fold! That may seem insane, but it must drive tons of Google’s users to click through their ads. If Facebook ever put their ads front and centre their users would riot.

    Google will be top of the ad pile for quite a while ;)

  6. Couple of things:

    1. Its important to note that comparison is between the .com domains only. A lot of google traffic goes to other .xyz domains but I believe that the same is not true for FB. Also google’s other properties like gmail etc are not included.

    2. I suspect a lot of FB hits are “automated” — e.g. people playing mafia wars, etc have found ways to automatically send clicks to FB. So a real human isnt visiting the FB pages.

  7. Agree that FB is not the place that folks go to shop…although it is happening a little.

    Facebook is myspace from 3 years ago. What is the next site?

  8. Ari, I couldn’t agree more and I’m quite pissed at myself for completely forgetting about visitor or user intent.

    Perhaps that makes Facebook Connect or the distributed part of FB’s business much more important. Facebook.com becomes the place the targeting data is captured and the distributed network of FBConnect sites becomes the place it’s monetized.

    Facebook needs to provide partner sites who’s users have monetizable intent with the targeting data and tools they need to satisfy that intent.

  9. I think the key thing that sets them apart is the attitudinal bearing of their users.

    Google is the place where people start their foray into the web. One of things people do on the web is look for things to buy. Showing them ads in that context is effective, as their actually relevant.

    Facebook, not so much. People are on Facebook to connect with their people, not to search the web for things to purchase. They’re just not in the buying frame of mind.

    So I think that while the raw traffics numbers are impressive (and they are), Facebook is going to have a harder time emulating Google’s printing press than the picture you paint here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.